Federal authorities have unsealed an eight-count indictment in the Eastern District of California charging Noah Lamb, a 24-year-old alleged member of the online “Terrorgram Collective,” with soliciting the murder of federal officials and other serious offenses. The indictment, made public on Wednesday, July 2, 2025, accuses Lamb of involvement in creating and promoting a “hit list” targeting individuals for assassination based on discriminatory criteria.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the charges stem directly from Lamb’s alleged activities related to this list of “high value targets.” The indictment includes one count of conspiracy, three counts of soliciting the murder of federal officials, three counts of doxing federal officials, and one count of threatening communications. Doxing, in this context, refers to the act of publishing private information about individuals, often with malicious intent.
Allegations Against Noah Lamb
The core of the prosecution’s case rests on the allegation that Noah Lamb played a role in developing and disseminating a list intended to identify and target individuals for violent acts, including murder. The charging documents specifically detail Lamb’s alleged efforts to solicit the killing of federal government employees, highlighting the perceived threat posed to public servants.
The list of alleged targets was reportedly expansive, encompassing not only U.S. federal officials but also state and local officials across the country. Furthermore, leaders of private companies and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) were also purportedly included. The criteria used for selecting these targets, as alleged by prosecutors, were based on discriminatory factors such as race, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, or gender identity, underscoring the hate-motivated nature of the plot.
The Terrorgram Collective and Its Ideology
The U.S. government alleges that the “Terrorgram Collective” is a transnational terrorist group that operates primarily on the messaging platform Telegram. Prosecutors describe the group as promoting racially or ethnically motivated violent extremism. Its stated goals reportedly include inciting a “race war” and orchestrating a collapse of the government to ultimately establish a “white ethnostate.”
Federal officials view such online collectives as significant threats, capable of radicalizing individuals and coordinating or inspiring violent acts across borders through the dissemination of extremist ideologies and target lists. The charges against Lamb underscore the government’s focus on disrupting these online networks and holding members accountable for their alleged roles in plotting or soliciting violence.
Official Response and Investigation
Acting U.S. Attorney Michele Beckwith for the Eastern District of California commented on the severity of the allegations, emphasizing the commitment of law enforcement to counter threats against public officials and individuals targeted due to their identities. Assistant Attorney General John A. Eisenberg of the Justice Department’s National Security Division also provided remarks, reinforcing the department’s dedication to combating domestic and transnational terrorism and protecting those who serve the public.
The investigation leading to Lamb’s indictment was conducted by the FBI Sacramento Field Office. The involvement of the FBI’s field office highlights the localized nature of the suspect’s alleged activities within the Eastern District of California, while the prosecution by the Justice Department’s National Security Division and the description of the group as “transnational” underscore the broader implications of the case.
Legal Outcome Pending
Noah Lamb is facing serious penalties if convicted on the charges brought against him. The potential maximum penalty for all eight counts is 85 years in federal prison. The unsealing of the indictment marks a formal step in the legal process, which will proceed through the federal court system in the Eastern District of California. The case will likely involve pre-trial hearings, discovery, and potentially a trial, unless a plea agreement is reached.
This case serves as a stark reminder of the persistent threat posed by online extremist groups and their efforts to incite violence and target individuals based on hate-filled ideologies. Authorities continue to monitor and investigate such online activities aimed at undermining public safety and democratic institutions.
